4.6 Article

Dimethyl Fumarate or Teriflunomide for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Meta-analysis of Post-marketing Studies

Journal

NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 1275-1283

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-023-01416-x

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; Disease-modifying treatments; Dimethyl fumarate; Teriflunomide; Head-to-head study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on real-world studies, we found that dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is slightly more effective than teriflunomide (TRF) in reducing the short-term relapse risk of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. However, there were no significant differences in reducing confirmed disability worsening and treatment discontinuation between the two drugs.
In the absence of head-to-head comparison trials, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of two largely prescribed oral platform disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, namely, dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and teriflunomide (TRF). We searched scientific databases to identify real-world studies reporting a direct comparison of DMF versus TRF. We fitted inverse-variance weighted meta-analyses with random effects models to estimate the risk ratio (RR) of relapse, confirmed disability worsening (CDW), and treatment discontinuation. Quantitative synthesis was accomplished on 14 articles yielding 11,889 and 8133 patients treated with DMF and TRF, respectively, with a follow-up ranging from 1 to 2.8 years. DMF was slightly more effective than TRF in reducing the short-term relapse risk (RR = 0.92, p = 0.01). Meta-regression analyses showed that such between-arm difference tends to fade in studies including younger patients and a higher proportion of treatment-naive subjects. There was no difference between DMF and TRF on the short-term risk of CDW (RR = 0.99, p = 0.69). The risk of treatment discontinuation was similar across the two oral drugs (RR = 1.02, p = 0.63), but it became slightly higher with DMF than with TRF (RR = 1.07, p = 0.007) after removing one study with a potential publication bias that altered the final pooled result, as also confirmed by a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. Discontinuation due to side effects and adverse events was reported more frequently with DMF than with TRF. Our findings suggest that DMF is associated with a lower risk of relapses than TRF, with more nuanced differences in younger naive patients. On the other hand, TRF is associated with a lower risk of treatment discontinuation for side effects and adverse events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available