4.5 Article

Psychotic symptoms in frontotemporal dementia with TDP-43 tend to be associated with type B pathology

Journal

NEUROPATHOLOGY AND APPLIED NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nan.12921

Keywords

ALS; frontotemporal dementia; FTLD-TDP; histology; psychosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study suggests that psychotic symptoms in patients with FTLD-TDP are associated with subtype B pathology, which is not solely explained by the effects of the C9orf72 mutation.
AimsPsychotic symptoms are increasingly recognized as a distinguishing clinical feature in patients with dementia due to frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 pathology (FTLD-TDP). Within this group, carriers of the C9orf72 repeat expansion are particularly prone to develop delusions and hallucinations. MethodsThe present retrospective study sought to provide novel details about the relationship between FTLD-TDP pathology and the presence of psychotic symptoms during life. ResultsWe found that FTLD-TDP subtype B was more frequent in patients with psychotic symptoms than in those without. This relationship was present even when corrected for the presence of C9orf72 mutation, suggesting that pathophysiological processes leading to the development of subtype B pathology may increase the risk of psychotic symptoms. Within the group of FTLD-TDP cases with subtype B pathology, psychotic symptoms tended to be associated with a greater burden of TDP-43 pathology in the white matter and a lower burden in lower motor neurons. When present, pathological involvement of motor neurons was more likely to be asymptomatic in patients with psychosis. ConclusionsThis work suggests that psychotic symptoms in patients with FTLD-TDP tend to be associated with subtype B pathology. This relationship is not completely explained by the effects of the C9orf72 mutation and raises the possibility of a direct link between psychotic symptoms and this particular pattern of TDP-43 pathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available