4.7 Article

Exploring the association of dairy product intake with the fatty acids C15:0 and C17:0 measured from dried blood spots in a multipopulation cohort: Findings from the Food4Me study

Journal

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 834-845

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201500483

Keywords

Biomarkers; Dairy intake; Dried blood spots; Heptadecanoic acid; Pentadecanoic acid

Funding

  1. European Commission [265494]
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/K02325X/1B] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [NIHR-RP-02-12-001] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [NIHR-RP-02-12-001] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ScopeThe use of biomarkers in the objective assessment of dietary intake is a high priority in nutrition research. The aim of this study was to examine pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) and heptadecanoic acid (C17:0) as biomarkers of dairy foods intake. Methods and resultsThe data used in the present study were obtained as part of the Food4me Study. Estimates of C15:0 and C17:0 from dried blood spots and intakes of dairy from a Food Frequency Questionnaire were obtained from participants (n = 1180) across seven countries. Regression analyses were used to explore associations of biomarkers with dairy intake levels and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to evaluate the fatty acids. Significant positive associations were found between C15:0 and total intakes of high-fat dairy products. C15:0 showed good ability to distinguish between low and high consumers of high-fat dairy products. ConclusionC15:0 can be used as a biomarker of high-fat dairy intake and of specific high-fat dairy products. Both C15:0 and C17:0 performed poorly for total dairy intake highlighting the need for caution when using these in epidemiological studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available