4.6 Review

Brain tumor-related epilepsy management: A Society for Neuro-oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad154

Keywords

antiseizure medication; brain tumor; epilepsy; glioma; seizure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor-related epilepsy (TRE) is a common and significant consequence of brain tumors, and managing TRE requires comprehensive understanding of diagnosis and treatment to improve quality of life. Complete removal of tumors is preferred for both oncologic and epilepsy reasons. Shared mechanisms between tumor growth and epilepsy offer potential for better targeted therapies.
Tumor-related epilepsy (TRE) is a frequent and major consequence of brain tumors. Management of TRE is required throughout the course of disease and a deep understanding of diagnosis and treatment is key to improving quality of life. Gross total resection is favored from both an oncologic and epilepsy perspective. Shared mechanisms of tumor growth and epilepsy exist, and emerging data will provide better targeted therapy options. Initial treatment with antiseizure medications (ASM) in conjunction with surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy is typical. The first choice of ASM is critical to optimize seizure control and tolerability considering the effects of the tumor itself. These agents carry a potential for drug-drug interactions and therefore knowledge of mechanisms of action and interactions is needed. A review of adverse effects is necessary to guide ASM adjustments and decision-making. This review highlights the essential aspects of diagnosis and treatment of TRE with ASMs, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy while indicating areas of uncertainty. Future studies should consider the use of a standardized method of seizure tracking and incorporating seizure outcomes as a primary endpoint of tumor treatment trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available