4.6 Article

Inhibition of the classical pathway of the complement cascade prevents early dendritic and synaptic degeneration in glaucoma

Journal

MOLECULAR NEURODEGENERATION
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13024-016-0091-6

Keywords

Glaucoma; Dendrite; Synapse; Complement; C1; C1qa; Retinal ganglion cell

Categories

Funding

  1. Glaucoma Research Foundation (GRH) [EY021525, EY011721, BB/F016352/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1108888] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Glaucoma is a complex, multifactorial disease characterised by the loss of retinal ganglion cells and their axons leading to a decrease in visual function. The earliest events that damage retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma are currently unknown. Retinal ganglion cell death appears to be compartmentalised, with soma, dendrite and axon changes potentially occurring through different mechanisms. There is mounting evidence from other neurodegenerative diseases suggesting that neuronal dendrites undergo a prolonged period of atrophy, including the pruning of synapses, prior to cell loss. In addition, recent evidence has shown the role of the complement cascade in synaptic pruning in glaucoma and other diseases. Results: Using a genetic (DBA/2J mouse) and an inducible (rat microbead) model of glaucoma we first demonstrate that there is loss of retinal ganglion cell synapses and dendrites at time points that precede axon or soma loss. We next determine the role of complement component 1 (C1) in early synaptic loss and dendritic atrophy during glaucoma. Using a genetic knockout of C1qa (D2. C1qa(-/-) mouse) or pharmacological inhibition of C1 (in the rat bead model) we show that inhibition of C1 is sufficient to preserve dendritic and synaptic architecture. Conclusions: This study further supports assessing the potential for complement-modulating therapeutics for the prevention of retinal ganglion cell degeneration in glaucoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available