4.8 Article

Enhancing the reliability and accuracy of AI-enabled diagnosis via complementarity-driven deferral to clinicians

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02437-x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A collaboration system, CoDoC, integrates decisions between human experts and AI to optimize screening and triaging, reducing clinicians' workload. CoDoC outperforms clinician-only or AI-only baselines in breast cancer screening and TB triaging workflows, reducing false positives and clinician workload. The sustained performance gains of CoDoC across various settings and AI systems highlight its potential in futuristic clinical applications.
A collaboration system helps to integrate decisions between human experts and AI to optimize screening and triaging and to reduce clinicians' workload. Predictive artificial intelligence (AI) systems based on deep learning have been shown to achieve expert-level identification of diseases in multiple medical imaging settings, but can make errors in cases accurately diagnosed by clinicians and vice versa. We developed Complementarity-Driven Deferral to Clinical Workflow (CoDoC), a system that can learn to decide between the opinion of a predictive AI model and a clinical workflow. CoDoC enhances accuracy relative to clinician-only or AI-only baselines in clinical workflows that screen for breast cancer or tuberculosis (TB). For breast cancer screening, compared to double reading with arbitration in a screening program in the UK, CoDoC reduced false positives by 25% at the same false-negative rate, while achieving a 66% reduction in clinician workload. For TB triaging, compared to standalone AI and clinical workflows, CoDoC achieved a 5-15% reduction in false positives at the same false-negative rate for three of five commercially available predictive AI systems. To facilitate the deployment of CoDoC in novel futuristic clinical settings, we present results showing that CoDoC's performance gains are sustained across several axes of variation (imaging modality, clinical setting and predictive AI system) and discuss the limitations of our evaluation and where further validation would be needed. We provide an open-source implementation to encourage further research and application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available