4.8 Article

KDM6A epigenetically regulates subtype plasticity in small cell lung cancer

Journal

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 1346-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-023-01210-z

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of KDM6A/UTX gene inactivation on the plasticity switch between ASCL1 and NEUROD1 subtypes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) using a genetically engineered mouse model. The results demonstrate that KDM6A inactivation induces the transition from ASCL1 to NEUROD1 subtype, providing insights into the heterogeneity and plasticity of SCLC subtypes.
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) exists broadly in four molecular subtypes: ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3 and Inflammatory. Initially, SCLC subtypes were thought to be mutually exclusive, but recent evidence shows intra-tumoural subtype heterogeneity and plasticity between subtypes. Here, using a CRISPR-based autochthonous SCLC genetically engineered mouse model to study the consequences of KDM6A/UTX inactivation, we show that KDM6A inactivation induced plasticity from ASCL1 to NEUROD1 resulting in SCLC tumours that express both ASCL1 and NEUROD1. Mechanistically, KDM6A normally maintains an active chromatin state that favours the ASCL1 subtype with its loss decreasing H3K4me1 and increasing H3K27me3 at enhancers of neuroendocrine genes leading to a cell state that is primed for ASCL1-to-NEUROD1 subtype switching. This work identifies KDM6A as an epigenetic regulator that controls ASCL1 to NEUROD1 subtype plasticity and provides an autochthonous SCLC genetically engineered mouse model to model ASCL1 and NEUROD1 subtype heterogeneity and plasticity, which is found in 35-40% of human SCLCs. Duplaquet, Li et al. identify and characterize KDM6A as an epigenetic regulator that impacts chromatin accessibility to modulate ASCL1-to-NEUROD1 subtype switching in small cell lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available