4.8 Article

High-affinity one-step aptamer selection using a non-fouling porous hydrogel

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-023-01973-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, a simple and fast method for aptamer enrichment and selection is proposed, based on the diffusion-binding process and immobilized target proteins in a non-fouling porous hydrogel. This method allows for rapid release of low-affinity aptamer candidates, while restricting high-affinity candidates due to their strong binding to the immobilized protein targets. Using this approach, an aptamer pool with strong binding to the protein targets can be obtained.
Aptamers, commonly referred to as chemical antibodies, are used in a wide range of applications including drug delivery and biosensing. However, the process of aptamer selection poses a substantial challenge, as it requires numerous cycles of enrichment and involves issues with nonspecific binding. We present a simple, fast instrument-free method for aptamer enrichment and selection based on a diffusion-binding process in a three-dimensional non-fouling porous hydrogel with immobilized target proteins. Low-affinity aptamer candidates can be rapidly released from the hydrogel, whereas high-affinity candidates are restricted due to their strong binding to the immobilized protein targets. Consequently, a one-step enriched aptamer pool can strongly bind the protein targets. This enrichment is consistent across five proteins with isoelectric points in varying ranges. With thrombin as a representative model, the anti-thrombin aptamer identified from an enriched aptamer pool has been found to have a binding affinity that is comparable to those identified over ten cycles of selection using traditional methods. A non-fouling, porous hydrogel makes aptamer selection and enrichment simple and efficient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available