4.6 Review

A Review on Microdialysis Calibration Methods: the Theory and Current Related Efforts

Journal

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 3506-3527

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-016-9929-8

Keywords

Microdialysis; Calibration method; Relative recovery; Absolute recovery

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Malaysia, through the MyBrain15 Program [890529115391]
  2. School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering (SMMRE), Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), through USM's RUI research grant [1001/PBAHAN/814177]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microdialysis is a sampling technique first introduced in the late 1950s. Although this technique was originally designed to study endogenous compounds in animal brain, it is later modified to be used in other organs. Additionally, microdialysis is not only able to collect unbound concentration of compounds from tissue sites; this technique can also be used to deliver exogenous compounds to a designated area. Due to its versatility, microdialysis technique is widely employed in a number of areas, including biomedical research. However, for most in vivo studies, the concentration of substance obtained directly from the microdialysis technique does not accurately describe the concentration of the substance on-site. In order to relate the results collected from microdialysis to the actual in vivo condition, a calibration method is required. To date, various microdialysis calibration methods have been reported, with each method being capable to provide valuable insights of the technique itself and its applications. This paper aims to provide a critical review on various calibration methods used in microdialysis applications, inclusive of a detailed description of the microdialysis technique itself to start with. It is expected that this article shall review in detail, the various calibration methods employed, present examples of work related to each calibration method including clinical efforts, plus the advantages and disadvantages of each of the methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available