4.4 Article

Optimal needle electromyography approach to the serratus anterior muscle

Journal

MUSCLE & NERVE
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 303-307

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mus.27933

Keywords

cadaver; electromyography; long thoracic nerve; serratus anterior; surface anatomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel needle insertion point for electromyography (EMG) of the serratus anterior (SA) was identified, which avoids injury to adjacent muscles and the long thoracic nerve (LTN). The accuracy of the new method was verified in cadavers. Compared to the conventional midaxillary method, the novel method improved the accuracy of needle EMG of the SA.
Introduction/AimsThere are two conventional needle electromyography (EMG) approaches to the serratus anterior (SA), both of which can result in erroneous insertion into adjacent structures such as the latissimus dorsi (LD), teres major, or external oblique abdominis muscles and pose a risk of long thoracic nerve (LTN) injury. Therefore, we identified a novel needle insertion point for the SA in cadavers that avoids other muscles and LTN injury. MethodsThis study included 17 cadavers: 12 to devise the new method and 5 to verify its accuracy. Novel landmarks were the inferior angle of the scapula (I), sternal notch (S), and xiphoid process (X). The relationships of the LD, pectoralis major (PM), SA, and LTN were determined relative to these landmarks. ResultsWhen inserting a needle into the proximal one third along the line connecting points I and X, there were adequate safety margins around the LD, PM, and LTN, and the new method had excellent accuracy. DiscussionCompared to the conventional midaxillary method, our novel method improved the accuracy of needle EMG of the SA. Follow-up studies using clinical imaging techniques are needed to verify whether above findings are equally applicable in living subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available