4.5 Article

Starvation and recovery in the deep-sea methanotroph Methyloprofundus sedimenti

Journal

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages 242-252

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.13553

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. Agouron Institute
  3. Beckman Foundation
  4. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF3780, GBMF3811]
  5. National Science Foundation [OCE-1046144, EAR-0950600]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1046144] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1046144] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the deep ocean, the conversion of methane into derived carbon and energy drives the establishment of diverse faunal communities. Yet specific biological mechanisms underlying the introduction of methane-derived carbon into the food web remain poorly described, due to a lack of cultured representative deep-sea methanotrophic prokaryotes. Here, the response of the deep-sea aerobic methanotroph Methyloprofundus sedimenti to methane starvation and recovery was characterized. By combining lipid analysis, RNA analysis, and electron cryotomography, it was shown that M. sedimenti undergoes discrete cellular shifts in response to methane starvation, including changes in headgroup-specific fatty acid saturation levels, and reductions in cytoplasmic storage granules. Methane starvation is associated with a significant increase in the abundance of gene transcripts pertinent to methane oxidation. Methane reintroduction to starved cells stimulates a rapid, transient extracellular accumulation of methanol, revealing a way in which methane-derived carbon may be routed to community members. This study provides new understanding of methanotrophic responses to methane starvation and recovery, and lays the initial groundwork to develop Methyloprofundus as a model chemosynthesizing bacterium from the deep sea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available