4.6 Article

Valence and Core Photoelectron Spectra of Aqueous I-3(-) from Multi-Reference Quantum Chemistry

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 28, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28145319

Keywords

photoelectron spectra; shake-up bands; multi-reference methods; triiodide anion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we addressed the controversy regarding the structural reorganization of the I-3(-) molecule in a solvent. We used a combination of experimental and theoretical approaches to obtain reliable evidence and focused on the importance of the 3d photoelectron spectrum in understanding the structure of I-3(-).
The I-3(-) molecule is known to undergo substantial structural reorganization upon solvation by a protic solvent, e.g., water. However, the details of this process are still controversially discussed in the literature. In the present study, we combined experimental and theoretical efforts to disentangle this controversy. The valence (5p), N-4,N-5 (4d), and M-4,M-5 (3d) edge photoelectron spectra were measured in an aqueous solution and computed using high-level multi-reference methods. Our previous publication mainly focused on obtaining reliable experimental evidence, whereas in the present article, we focused primarily on theoretical aspects. The complex electronic structure of I-3(-) requires the inclusion of both static and dynamic correlation, e.g., via the multi-configurational perturbation theory treatment. However, the resulting photoelectron spectra appear to be very sensitive to problems with variational stability and intruder states. We attempted to obtain artifact-free spectra, allowing for a more reliable interpretation of experiments. Finally, we concluded that the 3d Photoelectron Spectrum (PES) is particularly informative, evidencing an almost linear structure with a smaller degree of bond asymmetry than previously reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available