Bader's Topological Bond Path Does Not Necessarily Indicate Stabilizing Interaction-Proof Studies Based on the Ng@[3(n)]cyclophane Endohedral Complexes

According to Bader's quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), the simultaneous presence of a bond path and the corresponding bond critical point between any two atoms is both a necessary and sufficient condition for the atoms to be bonded to one another. In principle, this means that this pair of atoms should make a stabilizing contribution to the molecular system. However, the multitude of so-called counterintuitive bond paths strongly suggests that this statement is not necessarily true. Particularly 'troublesome' are endohedral complexes, in which encapsulation-enforced proximity between the trapped guest (e.g., an atom) and the host's cage system usually 'produces' many counterintuitive bond paths. In the author's opinion, the best evidence to demonstrate the repulsive nature of the intra-cage guest. . .host interaction is the use of some trapping systems containing small escape channels and then showing that the initially trapped entity spontaneously escapes outside the host's cage during geometry optimization of the initially built guest@host endohedral complex. For this purpose, a group of 24 Ng@[3n]cyclophane (3=n=6) endohedral complexes is used. As a result, arguments are presented showing that Bader's topological bond path does not necessarily indicate a stabilizing interaction.

Automated summary

Based on Bader's quantum theory, the presence of a bond path and bond critical point between two atoms is considered necessary and sufficient for them to be bonded. However, the existence of counterintuitive bond paths suggests that this statement may not always hold true, especially in endohedral complexes. Through experimental results, the author demonstrates that Bader's topological bond path does not always indicate stabilizing interactions.