Journal
MODERN PATHOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100162
Keywords
breast cancer; decision making; diagnosis; eye-tracking; medical education; pathology
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
An accurate histopathologic diagnosis on surgical biopsy material is necessary for clinical management and has important implications for research, clinical trial design, and public health education. This study identified sources of diagnostic error in the interpretation of digitized breast biopsy slides and found that errors mainly occurred in recognizing the most significant pathology region, describing its features accurately, and making a correct diagnosis.
An accurate histopathologic diagnosis on surgical biopsy material is necessary for the clinical management of patients and has important implications for research, clinical trial design/enroll-ment, and public health education. This study used a mixed methods approach to isolate sources of diagnostic error while residents and attending pathologists interpreted digitized breast biopsy slides. Ninety participants, including pathology residents and attending physicians at major United States medical centers reviewed a set of 14 digitized whole-slide images of breast biopsies. Each case had a consensus-defined diagnosis and critical region of interest (cROI) representing the most significant pathology on the slide. Participants were asked to view unmarked digitized slides, draw their participant region of interest (pROI), describe its features, and render a diagnosis. Participants' review behavior was tracked using case viewer software and an eye-tracking device. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated in comparison to the consensus diagnosis. We measured the frequency of errors emerging during 4 interpretive phases: (1) detecting the cROI, (2) recognizing its relevance, (3) using the correct terminology to describe findings in the pROI, and (4) making a diagnostic decision. According to eye-tracking data, trainees and attending pathologists were very likely (similar to 94% of the time) to find the cROI when inspecting a slide. However, trainees were less likely to consider the cROI relevant to their diagnosis. Pathology trainees (41% of cases) were more likely to use incorrect terminology to describe pROI features than attending pathologists (21% of cases). Failure to accurately describe features was the only factor strongly associated with an incorrect diagnosis. Identifying where errors emerge in the interpretive and/or descriptive process and working on building organ-specific feature recognition and verbal fiuency in describing those features are critical steps for achieving competency in diagnostic decision making. (c) 2023 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available