4.7 Article

N-rich hypercrosslinked porous polymers for highly efficient preconcentration and sensitive detection of chlorophenols

Journal

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 190, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-023-05918-5

Keywords

Chlorophenols; Sorbent extraction; Porous polymers; Solid-phase extraction; HPLC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three novel N-rich hypercrosslinked porous polymers (NHCP1, NHCP2, and NHCP3) were developed using Friedel-Crafts alkylation. NHCP1 showed the best adsorption performance for chlorophenol pollutants with a remarkably large surface area (2066 m(2) g(-1)). A sensitive and simple method using NHCP1 as a sorbent was developed for the preconcentration and determination of chlorophenols in real samples.
Three novel N-rich hypercrosslinked porous polymers (NHCP1, NHCP2, and NHCP3) were facilely developed using Friedel-Crafts alkylation. NHCP1 with a remarkably large surface area (2066 m(2) g(-1)) showed the best adsorption performance for chlorophenol pollutants. A sensitive and simple method was developed by using NHCP1 as a sorbent for solid-phase extraction to preconcentrate several chlorophenols in honey, water, and peach beverage samples followed by determination using a high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector. The detection wavelength was 280 nm. Under the optimized conditions, the linear ranges were 1.67-1000 ng g(-1) for honey, 0.170-100 ng mL(-1) for water, and 0.330-100 ng mL(-1) for peach beverage samples. The detection limits (S/N = 3) were 0.500-2.00 ng g(-1), 0.0500-0.100 ng mL(-1), and 0.100-0.200 ng mL(-1), respectively. Recovery values were 89.3-111% with relative standard deviations <9.4%. The proposed extraction/preconcentration and quantitative analysis method provides an affordable and effective alternative for the preconcentration and determination of low levels of chlorophenols in real samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available