4.7 Article

Electrochemical determination of thiethylperazine using semi-graphitized carbon nanofibers-MnO nanocomposite

Journal

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 190, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-023-06025-1

Keywords

Thiethylperazine; Carbon nanofibers; Carbon nanocomposite; Modified glassy carbon electrode; Differential pulse voltammetry; Amperometry; Flow injection analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new voltammetric method using a glassy carbon electrode modified with semi-graphitized carbon nanofibers/MnO nanocomposite is proposed for high sensitive THP determination. The method demonstrates high repeatability and sensitivity, with the ability to accurately determine THP in complex matrices.
A new voltammetric method is proposed for high sensitive thiethylperazine (THP) determination, using a glassy carbon electrode modified with semi-graphitized carbon nanofibers/MnO nanocomposite (eCNF/MnO/GC). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first electrochemical assay of THP determination, and the first use of the eCNF/MnO as the electrode modifier. The proposed method using eCNF/MnO/GC is characterized by high repeatability and sensitivity of measurements, with the linearity of THP in the range from 0.05 to 2.2 mu mol L-1. The lowest detection limit achieved on the eCNF/MnO/GC electrode for 30 s of preconcentration was 6.3 nmol L-1 THP in 0.05 mol L-1 acetate buffer of pH 5.6. The proposed method was successfully applied to highly sensitive THP determination in complex matrices, such as tablets and plasma with good recovery (98-103%). The RSD value obtained for THP measurement at a concentration of 0.1 mu mol L-1 was 1.3%. Amperometric measurements of THP under the flow injection conditions were also performed to indicate the possibility of its fast and accurate determination (103% and 95% for unmodified and modified electrode, respectively), with the duration of single analysis of approx. 30 s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available