4.7 Article

Minimum resolution requirements of digital pathology images for accurate classification

Journal

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102891

Keywords

Digital pathology; Image quality; Deep learning; Automated diagnostics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The digitization of pathology is hindered by barriers like cost and pathologist reluctance. This study uses deep learning models to determine the minimum image quality requirements for binary classification of histopathology images of breast tissue. The results show that macroscopic features are sufficient for accurate classification, suggesting the potential of a rapid low-cost imaging system to alleviate the workload of pathologists.
Digitization of pathology has been proposed as an essential mitigation strategy for the severe staffing crisis facing most pathology departments. Despite its benefits, several barriers have prevented widespread adoption of digital workflows, including cost and pathologist reluctance due to subjective image quality concerns. In this work, we quantitatively determine the minimum image quality requirements for binary classification of histopathology images of breast tissue in terms of spatial and sampling resolution. We train an ensemble of deep learning classifier models on publicly available datasets to obtain a baseline accuracy and computationally degrade these images according to our derived theoretical model to identify the minimum resolution necessary for acceptable diagnostic accuracy. Our results show that images can be degraded significantly below the resolution of most commercial whole-slide imaging systems while maintaining reasonable accuracy, demonstrating that macroscopic features are sufficient for binary classification of stained breast tissue. A rapid low-cost imaging system capable of identifying healthy tissue not requiring human assessment could serve as a triage system for reducing caseloads and alleviating the significant strain on the current workforce.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available