4.7 Article

Animal performance and meat quality characteristics from feedlot-finished steers fed increasing levels of wet distillers grain

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 204, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109214

Keywords

Beef; Shear force; Fatty acids; Consumer sensory panel; Lipid oxidation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of wet distiller grain plus solubles (WDGS) on beef quality and consumer sensory evaluation. The results showed that increasing the proportion of WDGS improved the levels of total PUFA, C18:2 n-6 and the n-6/n-3 ratio, but decreased the C16:1 to C18:0 ratio. However, higher levels of WDGS also led to increased lipid oxidation. Consumer sensory evaluation revealed that flavor and overall liking scores were improved by the inclusion of WDGS in the diet.
One hundred forty-four steers were group-housed in 24 pens that were randomly assigned to one of four dietary treatments defined by the proportion of wet distiller grain plus solubles (WDGS; 0, 15, 30, or 45%) and fed for 84 d pre-slaughter. Animal performance was evaluated using the pen as the experimental unit. Whereas for carcass and meat quality characteristics, meat oxidative stability, and the consumer sensory quality of longissimus thoracis muscle one animal from each pen was randomly selected and used as the experimental unit. No differences (P > 0.05) were observed for subcutaneous fat thickness, rib eye area, marbling score or pH, color parameters, proximate composition, sarcomere length, Warner Bratzler shear force, and cooking loss. Feeding WDGS linearly increased total PUFA (P = 0.05), C18:2 n-6 (P = 0.004) proportions, and n-6/n-3 ratio (P < 0.01) but reduced C16:1 to C18:0 ratio (P < 0.01). Lipid oxidation was greater in beef from steers fed 30% and 45% WDGS (P = 0.05). Dietary WDGS linearly improved (P < 0.05) flavor and overall linking score in the consumer sensory panel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available