4.7 Article

Hydrochars derived from plant biomass under various conditions: Characterization and potential applications and impacts

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 267, Issue -, Pages 253-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.026

Keywords

Black carbon; Hydrochar; Hydrothermal carbonization; Adsorbent; Phytotoxicity

Funding

  1. NSF [CBET-1054405]
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1054405] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrothermally carbonized biomass (hydrochar) has received increased attention recently as a potential agent for contaminant remediation and soil improvement. There is a need to understand how the properties of hydrochar vary with production conditions. In this work, sugarcane bagasse, hickory, and peanut hull were converted into hydrochars at three different temperatures (200 degrees C, 250 degrees C, and 300 degrees C). Basic physicochemical properties of the nine hydrochars were determined and batch aqueous sorption experiments were conducted to measure ability of the hydrochars to sorb methylene blue, lead, and phosphate. The yield, surface area, and pore volume of the hydrochars decreased with increasing conversion temperatures. Among all the hydrochars, the ones made at the lowest temperature (200 degrees C) were the best for sorption of methylene blue and lead. However, none of the hydrochars were able to remove significant amounts of phosphate from solution. In addition, the hydrochars did not significantly affect seed germination rate, though some did have a significant effect on root development of seedlings. Findings from this work suggest that lower temperature hydrochars may be optimal for contaminant remediation because of their higher sorption ability and absence of negative effect on plants. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available