4.7 Article

Measurement and analysis of polarization gradient relaxation in the atomic comagnetometer

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113043

Keywords

SERF comagnetometer; Optical pumping; Polarization gradient relaxation; Three- dimensional polarization distribution; Fermi contact field

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a three-dimensional model and measurement method are proposed to study the transverse nuclear spin relaxation in the spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF) comagnetometer. The model explains the observed plateau in the polarization gradient relaxation rate (PGRR), and the measurement method confirms the significance of PGRR in the SERF comagnetometer. This research supports improving the long-term stability of the SERF comagnetometer and can be applied to other atomic sensors.
In the spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF) comagnetometer, the transverse nuclear spin relaxation associated with the electron spin polarization gradient restricts the low-frequency magnetic-field suppression ability and self-compensation performance. A three-dimensional model and a measurement method of polarization gradient relaxation rate (PGRR) in the SERF comagnetometer are proposed in this paper. A plateau of PGRR is discovered and well explained by the model. The proposed measurement method confirms that the PGRR accounts for 90% similar to 98% of the transverse nuclear spin relaxation in the SERF comagnetometer. In addition, the model guides the selection of system parameters to manipulate the polarization distribution, thereby the PGRR is reduced by 14.88 times from 0.02166 1/s to 0.00145 1/s. This research supports improving the long-term stability of the SERF comagnetometer, and the proposed model and method can be extended to other atomic sensors, such as the SERF magnetometer and nuclear magnetic resonance gyroscope.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available