4.7 Article

In-line measurement of fiber mass fraction using Terahertz spectroscopy for a function-oriented quality assurance of glass fiber sheet molding compound

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113560

Keywords

Terahertz; Sheet molding compound; Fiber mass fraction; Glass fiber; Function-oriented measurement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study extends a non-destructive measurement model for local fiber mass fraction using Terahertz spectroscopy, suitable for multiple specimen thicknesses. A thorough analysis of measurement uncertainty shows a significant reduction compared to manufacturing process uncertainty, with short measurement times suitable for in-line applications. Integrating the measurement results into a parametrized finite element model reduces the error between physical experiments and simulations.
Glass fiber sheet molding compounds are a popular fiber-reinforced polymer because of their good processability. Both fiber mass fraction (FMF) and fiber orientation distribution significantly determine the mechanical properties of manufactured components. Local random variations in both properties occur during prepreg production and molding. This contribution expands a non-destructive measurement model for local FMF using Terahertz spectroscopy towards multiple specimen thicknesses. A thorough measurement uncertainty analysis according to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) shows an uncertainty reduction by 70 % compared to the uncertainty resulting from the manufacturing process. Measurement times of 0.5 s qualify the methodology for an in-line application. Integrating the measurement results into a parametrized, component -specific finite element model reduces the root mean squared error between physical experiments and simulations by 33 and 54 % compared to simulations with nominal fiber mass fractions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available