Journal
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages 1602-1612Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.005
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated whether the use of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel is associated with different risks for thrombotic events or major bleeding among acute myocardial infarction patients with a prior history of acute ischemic stroke. The study found no significant differences in the primary and secondary effectiveness outcomes between the two treatment groups, but the use of ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage.
Objective: To investigate whether use of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel is associated with different risks for thrombotic events or major bleeding among acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with a prior history of acute ischemic stroke.Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the Health and Welfare Database in Taiwan. Stroke patients prescribed ticagrelor plus aspirin or clopidogrel plus aspirin after a primary hospitalization for AMI between July 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018, were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance covariates between treatment groups. The primary effectiveness outcome included a composite measure of AMI, acute ischemic stroke, or all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcome included a composite measure of intracranial hem -orrhage (ICH) and major gastrointestinal bleeding. The secondary effectiveness and safety outcomes comprised each of the individual components that make up the primary effectiveness and safety outcomes, respectively.Results: A total of 1691 eligible patients were included in the study, of whom 734 (43.4%) received ticagrelor plus aspirin and 957 received clopidogrel plus aspirin. There were no significant differences observed in the primary and secondary effectiveness outcomes between the two study groups. However, the use of ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of ICH (ticagrelor: 8.68 per 1000 person-year; clopidogrel: 2.17 per 1,000 person-year; HR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 8.81, P 1/4 .01) compared with clopidogrel. Conclusion: In AMI patients with a history of acute ischemic stroke, the risks of cardiovascular events were comparable between ticagrelor plus aspirin and clopidogrel plus aspirin. However, ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of ICH. Ticagrelor should be used cautiously in AMI patients with a history of acute ischemic stroke.(c) 2023 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. center dot Mayo Clin Proc. 2023;98(11):1602-1612
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available