4.6 Article

Nb-doped double perovskite Sr2CoFeO6_ & delta; as an efficient and prospective electrode for quasi-symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

MATERIALS LETTERS
Volume 350, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.134892

Keywords

SSOFCs; Nanoparticles; Fuel flexibility; Reversibility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of identical anode and cathode materials in symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells (SSOFCs) can reduce costs and prolong operational life. In this study, Nb-doped double perovskite Sr2CoFeO6 was employed as the electrode material for SSOFCs, which improved electrochemical performance and reversibility. The Nb-doped sample Sr2CoFe0.7Nb0.3O6 exhibited good chemical compatibility with SOFC electrolytes and demonstrated fuel-flexible characteristics.
The utilization of identical anode and cathode materials in symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells (SSOFCs) can efficiently reduce their fabrication costs and prolong their operational life. Herein, Nb-doped double perovskite Sr2CoFeO6-& delta; of a traditional cathode was employed as the electrode material for SSOFCs. Notably, the electrochemical performance and reversibility were improved due to Nb doping. The Nb-doped sample Sr2CoFe0.7Nb0.3O6_& delta;.5 (SCFN3) was synthesized in air, which decomposed into Co-Fe alloy, SrCoO2.25, and Sr3FeNbO6_& delta; in H2. Following calcination in air, the sample reverted to the original perovskite structure. The SCFN3 sample exhibited good chemical compatibility with SOFC electrolytes such as La0.8Sr0.2Ga0.8Mg0.2O3_& delta; (LSGM), Sm0.2Ce0.8O2_& delta;, and BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3_& delta;. A single cell consisting of 300-& mu;m LSGM electrolyte exhibited maximum power densities of 951, 510, 563, and 397 mW/cm2 at 850 & DEG;C when using H2, C3H8, liquid C2H5OH, and solid C as fuels, respectively. These findings adequately demonstrate the fuel-flexible characteristics of SOFCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available