3.9 Article

miR-204 Targets PERK and Regulates UPR Signaling and β-Cell Apoptosis

Journal

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 917-924

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/me.2016-1056

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Grants [R01DK078752, UC4DK104204]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Grant [3-SRA-2014-302-M-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress plays an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetes and the associated beta-cell apoptosis. Although microRNAs (miRNAs) have been widely studied in various diseases including diabetes, the role of miRNAs in ER stress and beta-cell apoptosis has only started to be elucidated. We recently showed that diabetes increases beta-cell miR-204 and have now discovered that miR- 204 directly targets the 3' untranslated region of protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK), 1 of the 3 ER transmembrane sensors and a key factor of the unfolded protein response (UPR). In addition, by using primary human islets, mouse islets, and INS-1 beta-cells, we found that miR- 204 decreased PERK expression as well as its downstream factors, activating transcription factor 4 and CCAAT enhancer-binding protein homologous protein, whereas it had no effect on the other 2 ER transmembrane sensors, activating transcription factor 6 and inositol-requiring enzyme-1 alpha. Interestingly, we discovered that miR-204 also inhibited PERK signaling in the context of ER stress, and this exacerbated ER stress-induced beta-cell apoptosis. This effect could be mimicked by PERK inhibitors supporting the notion that the miR-204-mediated inhibition of PERK and UPR signaling was conferring these detrimental effects on cell survival. Taken together, we have identified PERK as a novel target of miR- 204 and show that miR-204 inhibits PERK signaling and increases ER stress-induced cell death, revealing for the first time a link between this miRNA and UPR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available