4.7 Article

High strength Hadfield steel produced using laser powder bed fusion of mixed powders

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112017

Keywords

Hadfield steel; Laser powder bed fusion; Mechanical properties; Grain refinement; Plastic deformation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hadfield steel (HS) containing 0.83 wt% carbon was manufactured using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) with mixed Fe-Mn, pure-Fe, and Fe-C powders. The LPBF HS has superior strength and hardness compared to conventionally fabricated HS, due to the refinement in grain size and increase in dislocation density caused by rapid solidification during LPBF. Carbide formation is prevented, and the main alloying elements are retained in solution.
Hadfield steel (HS) containing-0.83 wt% Carbon has been manufactured using the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) of mixed Fe-Mn, pure-Fe and Fe-C powders. Results show that the as-fabricated alloy is fully austenitic with the absence of carbides-a typical feature in the cast alloy that necessitates its solutionizing and quenching. The strength (ry = 595.5 & PLUSMN; 18.1 MPa, ru = 950.2 & PLUSMN; 28.6 MPa) and hardness (318.6 & PLUSMN; 7.1 HV) of the LPBF HS are superior to those of the conventionally fabricated HS, while the impact toughness is similar, and ductility is inferior. The yield strength enhancement is mainly due to the refinement in the grain size and increase in the dislocation density, which occurs due to the rapid solidification conditions that prevail during LPBF. This rapid solidification also prevents carbide formation and retain the main alloying elements (C and Mn) in solution. Thus conventional water quenching process can be completely eliminated.& COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available