Influence of seabed profile on the seismic response of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines including dynamic soil-structure interaction

In this article, the seismic response of four different Offshore Wind Turbines (OWTs) from 5 to 15 MW, founded on monopiles embedded in homogeneous and non-homogeneous soil profiles with equivalent shear-wave velocities from 100 to 300 m/s is analysed. Two types of variable soil profiles with a semi-parabolic variation of the shear-wave velocity as depth increases are considered. The system seismic response under ten different accelerograms is computed through a finite element substructuring model in frequency domain. The foundation behaviour is obtained by a continuum model including kinematic and inertial interaction. Several models, in addition to that of rigid base condition, are considered to determine the influence of soil structure interaction (SSI), as well as the contribution of each kinematic interaction (KI) factor. The seismic response of the OWTs is obtained in terms of maximum shear forces and bending moments at mudline level, as well as the acceleration amplification factor at hub level. It is found that the maximum response is produced when SSI is considered, including both the inertial and kinematic interaction. The differences arising due to the soil profile definition are shown to be mainly related to the rotational KI factor, which significantly affects the second vibration mode of the system. The largest responses are obtained for the homogeneous equivalent profile.

Automated summary

This article analyses the seismic response of four different types of Offshore Wind Turbines (OWTs), ranging from 5 to 15 MW, with foundations on monopiles embedded in homogeneous and non-homogeneous soil profiles. The seismic response is calculated using a finite element substructuring model in the frequency domain under ten different accelerograms. The results show that the maximum response is obtained when soil structure interaction (SSI), including both inertial and kinematic interaction, is considered. The differences in response due to the soil profile definition are mainly related to the rotational kinematic interaction factor.