4.7 Article

Highly sensitive lateral flow immunoassays based on Ag@Au nanoflowers with marine medaka (Oryzias melastigm) vitellogenin as a target analyte

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115248

Keywords

Ag@Au nanoflowers; Lateral flow immunoassay; Biomarker; Vitellogenin; Environmental estrogens; Marine medaka

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Au coated Ag nanoflowers were used as labeling probes to develop a lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of piscine vitellogenin. The assay showed high sensitivity and specificity, and could be performed on-site without expensive and complicated instruments.
In order to improve the sensitivity of lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) for the detection of piscine vitellogenin (Vtg), a well-established biomarker for environmental estrogens, Au coated Ag nanoflowers (Ag@Au NFs) were used as labeling probes to develop a LFIA for marine medaka Vtg. The synthesized Ag@Au NFs with good monodispersity had an average diameter of 44.1 nm and absorbance peak of 524 nm. When the concentration of goat anti-mouse IgG and anti-Vtg polyclonal antibody (anti-Vtg PAbs) were 1.3 and 0.4 mg/mL, respectively, the detection range of the LFIA was 0.19-25 ng/mL, and the visual detection limit was 0.1 ng/mL, which was approximately 80 times lower than that of LFIAs based on other nanoparticles (Au NPs, Ag NPs, Au NFs, and FM). After evaluation of its specificity and robustness, the usefulness of Ag@Au NFs labeled LFIA was validated by measuring Vtg induction in the plasma of marine medaka exposed to bisphenol A, a weak estrogenic chemical. This highly sensitive lateral flow immunoassay could detect Vtg biomarker within 15 min without the need of expensive and complicated instruments, and thus offered an ultrasensitive and robust on-site detection method for estrogenic activity in field environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available