4.7 Review

An assessment of approaches and techniques for estimating water pollution releases from aquaculture production facilities

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 196, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115661

Keywords

Aquaculture production facilities; Water pollution; Non-point pollution discharges

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid expansion of the aquaculture industry has raised concerns about water pollution from aquaculture production facilities (APFs). However, the existing regulatory tools lack specific capabilities for estimating aquaculture-related pollution, especially from mariculture non-point sources (NPS). Therefore, there is a need for a guidance document to compile and summarize estimation methods.
The rapid expansion of the aquaculture industry raises concerns about water pollution from aquaculture production facilities (APFs). APFs release pollutants, including fish feed and feces, threatening the environment. The United Nations has introduced regulatory tools like the National Baseline Budget of pollutants (NBB) and Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRs) to monitor pollution. However, these tools lack specific capabilities for estimating aquaculture-related pollution, especially from mariculture non-point sources (NPS). The United Nations Programme for the Assessment and Control of Marine Pollution in the Mediterranean (UNEP/ MAP) stresses the need for an inventory and guidance document. Our comprehensive literature review focused on (1) NPS discharges of specific pollutants from APFs, (2) methods for estimating potential pollution releases from aquaculture, and (3) compiling information into a guidance document summarizing estimation methods. The geographical coverage of our study includes Europe, Australia, the USA, Canada, and East/Southeast Asia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available