4.7 Article

Bioaccumulation of estuarine pollutants in leaf oysters (Isognomon ephippium) on the mid-north coast, New South Wales, Australia

Journal

MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.106065

Keywords

Bivalves; Bioindicators; Trace metals; Metalloids; Pesticides; Subtropical estuaries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated trace metals, metalloids, and pesticides in leaf oyster soft tissue and shells, compared to sediment in five estuaries in northern New South Wales, Australia. Results showed higher concentrations of certain elements in sediments, while others bioaccumulated in the oyster tissue. The accumulation of metals and metalloids increased with oyster size and negatively impacted oyster condition, suggesting that leaf oysters are useful bioindicators for estuarine pollution.
Filter feeding bivalves are useful bioindicators for the detection of biologically available pollutants. We investigated trace metals, metalloids, and pesticides in leaf oyster (Isognomon ephippium) soft tissue and shells and compared them to sediment in five estuaries in northern New South Wales, Australia. Concentrations of Pb, Cr, Mn, Ni, Fe and Al were higher in sediments, whereas Zn, Cd, Ag, Hg, Se and As bioaccumulated in the soft tissue. The amount of Cu, Hg and Ni in the sediment from Tweed and Richmond River estuaries exceeded the Australian national sediment quality guideline values. Only one pesticide, atrazine, was detected in leaf oyster soft tissue. Combinations of six elements in the soft tissue were the best predictors of oyster condition index and shell size, whereas sediment contaminants showed weak relationships. Overall, the bioaccumulation of metals and metalloids increases with leaf oyster size and reduces leaf oyster condition, suggesting these large bivalves are useful bioindicators for pollution in estuarine environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available