4.7 Article

Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 929-942

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13428

Keywords

amphibian; detection probability; environmental DNA; fish; monitoring; wildlife management

Funding

  1. SPYGEN
  2. ONEMA
  3. EDF
  4. Parc National du Mercantour
  5. STOWA
  6. Waterboard Brabantse Delta
  7. Waterboard Rijn en Ijssel
  8. Waterboard Vallei en Veluwe
  9. Waterboard de Dommel
  10. Network Ecological Monitoring (NEM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global biodiversity in freshwater and the oceans is declining at high rates. Reliable tools for assessing and monitoring aquatic biodiversity, especially for rare and secretive species, are important for efficient and timely management. Recent advances in DNA sequencing have provided a new tool for species detection from DNA present in the environment. In this study, we tested whether an environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach, using water samples, can be used for addressing significant questions in ecology and conservation. Two key aquatic vertebrate groups were targeted: amphibians and bony fish. The reliability of this method was cautiously validated in silico, invitro and insitu. When compared with traditional surveys or historical data, eDNA metabarcoding showed a much better detection probability overall. For amphibians, the detection probability with eDNA metabarcoding was 0.97 (CI=0.90-0.99) vs. 0.58 (CI=0.50-0.63) for traditional surveys. For fish, in 89% of the studied sites, the number of taxa detected using the eDNA metabarcoding approach was higher or identical to the number detected using traditional methods. We argue that the proposed DNA-based approach has the potential to become the next-generation tool for ecological studies and standardized biodiversity monitoring in a wide range of aquatic ecosystems. see also the Perspective by Hoffmann, Schubert and Calvignac-Spencer

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available