4.7 Article

Electrospun zein incorporating phycocyanin and Spirulina extract: Fabrication, characterization, and potential application

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115408

Keywords

Food packaging; Phycocyanin; Spirulina extract; Walnut; Zein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrospinning was used to develop zein fibers containing phycocyanin and aqueous-ethanolic extract of Spirulina (AEES) for packaging walnut samples. The fibers showed optimal outcomes at a concentration of 0.3 g/mL under specific conditions. The phycocyanin-loaded and AEES-loaded zein fibers exhibited similar morphology and diameter, and effectively reduced bacteria growth and oxidation in the walnut samples.
Electrospinning was used to develop zein fibers containing phycocyanin and aqueous-ethanolic extract of Spirulina (AEES) for elucidating the potent packaging properties of phycocyanin and AEES on walnut samples. Morphological results revealed that using the fibers at 0.3 g/mL concentration resulted in optimal outcomes under the conditions of 15 kV, 0.5 mL/h, and 10 cm. These findings showed that phycocyanin-loaded and AEESloaded zein fibers were similar in morphology and diameter. The encapsulation efficiencies of phycocyaninloaded and AEES-loaded zein fibers were 90.60% and 90.68%, respectively. Moreover, phycocyanin-loaded and AEES-loaded zein fibers were more active against Staphylococcus aureus than Escherichia coli. By measuring the total phenol content, flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity, the walnut samples were suitably packaged by both phycocyanin-loaded and AEES-loaded zein fibers. The packaging materials decreased peroxide and thiobarbituric acid values in the walnut samples. The results propose the suitability of zein fibers with phycocyanin and AEES for applications on perishable food products as promising antioxidant food packaging materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available