4.6 Article

The evaluation of the adhesion defects in FRCM reinforcements for masonry constructions by Sideband Peak Count based nonlinear acoustic technique

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10775463231187456

Keywords

Masonry; fiber-reinforced cementitious matrix composites; nonlinear ultrasonic; sideband peak count technique; adhesion defects; non-destructive testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites have become reliable strengthening materials for historical masonry constructions. In this paper, an innovative nonlinear ultrasonic approach is proposed to analyze the bond behavior of FRCM. Experimental tests are conducted to assess the adhesion defects between FRCM and masonry as well as within the fiber grid.
Fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites have emerged as reliable strengthening materials especially for historical masonry constructions. Their strengthening effectiveness strongly depends on the bond at the matrix-fibers interface and at the matrix-substrate interface; thus, the analysis of FRCM bond behavior is of crucial relevance. The strong diffusion of the FRCM composites for the reinforcement of masonry and concrete constructions requires suitable experimental techniques for assessing possible defects in the adhesion between FRCM and masonry, and between FRCM layers. To this aim, in this paper, an innovative nonlinear ultrasonic approach based on the sideband peak count technique is proposed. This approach is discussed and validated through acoustic (sonic and ultrasonic) tests performed on masonry tuff substrates reinforced with FRCM mortars embedding a basalt fibers grid and having known artificial defects at the adhesion between masonry and the reinforcement as well as in the fiber grid.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available