4.5 Article

Outcomes of lower extremity revascularization in octogenarians and nonagenarians for intermittent claudication

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.08.112

Keywords

Claudication; Infrainguinal bypass; Lower extremity revascularization; Nonagenarian; Octogenarian; Peripheral vascular intervention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of interventions for intermittent claudication in different age groups. The results showed that patients aged 80 years and above had higher rates of perioperative hematoma and 30-day mortality, as well as fewer independently ambulatory patients at 1 year post-intervention. Risk-adjusted analysis demonstrated that this age group had higher risks of reintervention/amputation/death, amputation/death, and mortality. Similar findings were observed in the octogenarian and nonagenarian group undergoing infrainguinal bypass. Therefore, the risks and benefits of revascularization should be carefully assessed in elderly patients with intermittent claudication, and medical and exercise therapy should be maximized.
Objective: Revascularization for intermittent claudication (IC) due to infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is dependent on durability and expected benefit. We aimed to assess outcomes for IC interventions in octogenarians and nonagenarians (age >= 80 years) and those younger than 80 years (age <80 years). Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried (2010-2020) for peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) and infrainguinal bypasses (IIBs) performed to treat IC. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes were analyzed (comparing age >= 80 years and age <80 years). Results: There were 84,210 PVIs (12.1% age >= 80 years and 87.9% age <80 years) and 10,980 IIBs (7.4% age >= 80 years and 92.6% age <80 years) for IC. For PVI, patients aged >= 80 years more often underwent femoropopliteal (70.7% vs 58.1%) and infrapopliteal (19% vs 9.3%) interventions, and less often iliac interventions (32.1% vs 48%) (P < .001 for all). Patients aged >= 80 years had more perioperative hematomas (3.5% vs 2.4%) and 30-day mortality (0.9% vs 0.4%) (P < .001). At 1-year post-intervention, the age >= 80 years cohort had fewer independently ambulatory patients (80% vs 91.5%; P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed patients aged >= 80 years had lower reintervention/amputation-free survival (81.4% vs 86.8%), amputation-free survival (87.1% vs 94.1%), and survival (92.3% vs 96.8%) (P < .001) at 1-year after PVI. Risk adjusted analysis showed that age >= 80 years was associated with higher reintervention/amputation/death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.35), amputation/death (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.61-2.13), and mortality (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.66-2.23) (P < .001 for all) for PVI. For IIB, patients aged >= 80 years more often had an infrapopliteal target (28.4% vs 19.4%) and had higher 30-day mortality (1.3% vs 0.5%), renal failure (4.1% vs 2.2%), and cardiac complications (5.4% vs 3.1%) (P < .001). At 1 year, the age >= 80 years group had fewer independently ambulatory patients (81.7% vs 88.8%; P = .02). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the age >= 80 years cohort had lower reintervention/amputation-free survival (75.7% vs 81.5%), amputation-free survival (86.9% vs 93.9%), and survival (90.4% vs 96.5%) (P < .001 for all). Risk-adjusted analysis showed age >= 80 years was associated with higher amputation/death (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.1-2.54; P = .015) and mortality (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.16-2.93; P = .009), but not reintervention/amputation/death (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.85-1.44; P = .47) after IIB. Conclusions: Octogenarians and nonagenarians have greater perioperative morbidity and long-term ambulatory impairment, limb loss, and mortality after PVI and IIB for claudication. Risks of intervention on elderly patients with claudication should be carefully weighed against the perceived benefits of revascularization. Medical and exercise therapy efforts should be maximized in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available