4.6 Article

Risk Stratification by Quantification of Perineural Cancer Invasion on Prostate Needle Core Biopsy: Should It Be Counted?

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 210, Issue 4, Pages 639-648

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003618

Keywords

biopsy; needle; paraneoplastic syndromes; nervous system; prognosis; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantification of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy showed significance as an independent predictor of prognosis, with multifocal perineural invasion and >1 perineural invasion per 10-mm tumor associated with worse outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Additionally, assigning points for multifocal perineural invasion improved the accuracy of predicting 5-year recurrence-free survival.
Purpose: We assessed the prognostic significance of quantification of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: We quantified actual perineural invasion foci in the entire prostate biopsy specimens from 724 patients and compared corresponding radical prostatectomy findings and long-term oncologic outcomes. Results: No perineural invasion was detected in 524 (72.4%) prostate biopsies, whereas 1 (n=129; 17.8%), 2 (n=40; 5.5%), 3 (n=18; 2.5%), 4 (n=7; 1.0%), and 5-10 (n=6; 0.8%) perineural invasion foci were present in other cases. We confirmed a higher risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with perineural invasion on prostate biopsy than in those with no perineural invasion (P <.001). Remarkably, recurrence-free survival was comparable between those with 0 vs 1 perineural invasion (P =.9) or 2 vs >= 3 perineural invasions (P =.3). Nonetheless, multifocal perineural invasion per prostate biopsy (vs single perineural invasion; P <.001) and >1 perineural invasion per 10-mm tumor (vs <= 1 perineural invasion; P =.008) were associated with worse outcomes. Interestingly, in a subgroup outcome analysis of single vs multifocal perineural invasions per prostate biopsy, there was a significant difference in patients showing perineural invasion involving only 1 of the sextant sites. In multivariable analysis, both multifocal perineural invasion/case (HR=5.48, P <.001) and >1 perineural invasion/10-mm tumor (HR=3.96, P <.001) showed significance for recurrence. Meanwhile, compared with CAPRA (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) score alone (0.687/0.685), Harrell's C index/AUC for predicting 5-year recurrence-free survival was gradually increased when 1 (0.722/0.740), 2 (0.747/0.773), or 3 (0.760/0.792) point(s) were additionally assigned to multifocal perineural invasion. Conclusions: Multifocal perineural invasion and >1 perineural invasion per 10-mm tumor on each prostate biopsy were thus found to be associated with poorer prognosis, as independent predictors, in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available