4.7 Article

Classification of oolong tea varieties based on computer vision and convolutional neural networks

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.13049

Keywords

machine learning; deep learning; convolutional neural network; MobileNet; tea classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses machine learning algorithms and computer vision techniques to automatically classify oolong tea leaves, achieving high accuracy and demonstrating the potential application value of this method.
BACKGROUNDIn the contemporary food industry, accurate and rapid differentiation of oolong tea varieties holds paramount importance for traceability and quality control. However, achieving this remains a formidable challenge. This study addresses this lacuna by employing machine learning algorithms - namely support vector machines (SVMs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) - alongside computer vision techniques for the automated classification of oolong tea leaves based on visual attributes.RESULTSAn array of 13 distinct characteristics, encompassing color and texture, were identified from five unique oolong tea varieties. To fortify the robustness of the predictive models, data augmentation and image cropping methods were employed. A comparative analysis of SVM- and CNN-based models revealed that the ResNet50 model achieved a high Top-1 accuracy rate exceeding 93%. This robust performance substantiates the efficacy of the implemented methodology for rapid and precise oolong tea classification.CONCLUSIONThe study elucidates that the integration of computer vision with machine learning algorithms constitutes a promising, non-invasive approach for the quick and accurate categorization of oolong tea varieties. The findings have significant ramifications for process monitoring, quality assurance, authenticity validation and adulteration detection within the tea industry. (c) 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available