4.6 Article

Structural numerical analysis of a branched modular stent-graft for aneurysms encompassing all zones of the aortic arch

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106135

Keywords

Stent-graft; Aneurysm; Aortic arch; Fluid-structure interaction; Numerical simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study structurally evaluated a modular branched stent-graft for aneurysms in the aortic arch using numerical simulations. The results showed that the stent-graft had minimal impact on the arterial wall, reducing the peak stresses in the aneurysm sac.
The development of stent-grafts for the total repair of aneurysms in the aortic arch is still a technical challenge due mainly to the anatomical complexity of this region. Research performed here structurally evaluated a modular branched stent-graft for aneurysms encompassing all zones of the aortic arch by means of numerical simulations using fluid-structure interaction. The geometric domain obtained by means of computed tomography was subjected to physiological boundary conditions. The blood was modelled as non-Newtonian by the Carreau model, and the arterial wall was modelled as anisotropic hyperelastic by the Holzapfel model. The material adopted for the stents was Nitinol, and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) was used for the graft. A comparison of the structural behaviour of the aneurysmal aortic arch before and after stent-graft implantation was performed. The numerical flow model was experimentally verified in vitro on a representative test bench of blood flow in the aortic arch. The stent-graft was shown to minimally modify arterial wall dynamics and was not susceptible to migration and endoleak. Peak stresses and strains were found in the stents and graft, respectively, while the stresses in the aneurysm sac were significantly reduced, of the order of 97.5%, due to the isolation of the arterial wall by the stent-graft.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available