4.6 Article

Increasing Volumetric Capacity Diminishes Rate Performance in Li-Ion Battery Electrodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 170, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/acf624

Keywords

batteries-li-ion; theory and modelling; electrode kinetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantitatively examines the relationship between the volumetric capacity of Li-storing electrodes and their rate performance, showing that capacity and rate performance are anti-correlated. This observation is consistent with a simple physical model which explains this effect based on the RC charging time of the electrode.
Combining high-capacity electrodes with good rate performance is essential for maximising both energy and power density in Li-ion batteries. While much effort has been dedicated to increasing both capacity and rate performance, little consideration has been made as to how an increase in specific or volumetric capacity might directly affect rate performance. Here, we quantitatively examine the relationship between the volumetric capacity of Li-storing electrodes and their rate performance using graphite/boron-nitride composite electrodes with a range of compositions as a model system. The rate performance of these cells is evaluated by fitting capacity vs rate curves to a semi-empirical equation and extracting a characteristic charge/discharge time. As graphite content and so electrode capacity are increased, we observe a linear, threefold increase of this characteristic time, representing a significant degradation in rate performance. This shows that capacity and rate performance are anti-correlated, an observation is consistent with the predictions of a simple physical model which shows this effect to be associated with the RC charging time of the electrode. Using no adjustable parameters, we find excellent agreement between the model and our experimental data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available