4.7 Article

Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium Definitions for Tricuspid Regurgitation and Trial Endpoints

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 17, Pages 1711-1735

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.008

Keywords

transcatheter; treatment; tricuspid regurgitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interest in TR has grown due to progressively worse outcomes associated with increasing TR severity. The aim of the Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium document is to standardize definitions and endpoints for trials addressing knowledge gaps in TR management. Another document will focus on defining trial endpoints and discussing trial design options.
Interest in the pathophysiology, etiology, management, and outcomes of patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has grown in the wake of multiple natural history studies showing progressively worse outcomes associated with increasing TR severity, even after adjusting for multiple comorbidities. Historically, isolated tricuspid valve surgery has been associated with high in-hospital mortality rates, leading to the development of transcatheter treatment options. The aim of this first Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium document is to standardize definitions of disease etiology and severity, as well as endpoints for trials that aim to address the gaps in our knowledge related to identification and management of patients with TR. Standardizing endpoints for trials should provide consistency and enable meaningful comparisons between clinical trials. A second Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium document will focus on further defining trial endpoints and will discuss trial design options.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of the American College of Cardiology and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available