4.7 Article

Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Patients Taking Antihypertensive Medications

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 19, Pages 1809-1823

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.045

Keywords

antihypertensive medications; Bayesian trial; renal denervation; uncontrolled hypertension; win ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension who were also taking antihypertensive medications. The study found no significant difference between the RDN group and the sham control group in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint. However, multiple secondary endpoint analyses favored RDN over the sham control.
Background Renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications.Objectives This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of RDN in the presence of antihypertensive medications.Methods SPYRAL HTN-ON MED is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded trial enrolling patients from 56 clinical centers worldwide. Patients were prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive medications. Patients were randomized to radiofrequency RDN or sham control procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 6 months between groups using a Bayesian trial design and analysis.Results The treatment difference in the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to 6 months between the RDN group (n = 206; -6.5 +/- 10.7 mm Hg) and sham control group (n = 131; -4.5 +/- 10.3 mm Hg) was -1.9 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.4 to 0.5 mm Hg; P = 0.12). There was no significant difference between groups in the primary efficacy analysis with a posterior probability of superiority of 0.51 (Bayesian treatment difference: -0.03 mm Hg [95% CI: -2.82 to 2.77 mm Hg]). However, there were changes and increases in medication intensity among sham control patients. RDN was associated with a reduction in office systolic BP compared with sham control at 6 months (adjusted treatment difference: -4.9 mm Hg; P = 0.0015). Night-time BP reductions and win ratio analysis also favored RDN. There was 1 adverse safety event among 253 assessed patients.Conclusions There was no significant difference between groups in the primary analysis. However, multiple secondary endpoint analyses favored RDN over sham control. (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Study [Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available