4.8 Article

Robust Carborane-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Hexane Separation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 145, Issue 43, Pages 23433-23441

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c04641

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hexane isomers are important in the petrochemical industry but separating them poses challenges. Traditional thermal separation methods are energy-intensive, so there is a growing demand for less energy-intensive nonthermal methods. Adsorption-based methods using MOFs have emerged as promising alternatives. In this study, two novel MOFs, NU-2004 and NU-2005, were successfully synthesized and showed exceptional thermal stability and structural rigidity, making significant advancements in hexane isomer separation compared to other MOFs.
Hexane isomers play a vital role as feedstocks and fuel additives in the petrochemical industry. However, their similar physical and chemical properties lead to significant challenges in the separation process. Traditional thermal separation techniques are energy-intensive and lead to significant carbon footprint penalties. As such, there is a growing demand for the development of less energy-intensive nonthermal separation methods. Adsorption-based separation methods, such as using solid sorbents or membranes, have emerged as promising alternatives to distillation. Here, we report the successful synthesis of two novel metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), NU-2004 and NU-2005, by incorporating a carborane-based three-dimensional (3D) linker and using aluminum and vanadium nodes, respectively. These MOFs exhibit exceptional thermal stability and structural rigidity compared to other MIL-53 analogues, which is further corroborated using synchrotron studies. Furthermore, the inclusion of the quasi-spherical 3D linker in NU-2004 demonstrates significant advancements in the separation of hexane isomers compared to other MIL MOFs containing two-dimensional (2D) and aliphatic 3D linkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available