4.8 Article

Role of Fast and Slow Inhibitors in Oscillatory Rhythm Design

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 145, Issue 42, Pages 23152-23159

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c07076

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the role of fast and slow inhibitors in oscillatory reaction networks was experimentally and theoretically analyzed. It was found that these inhibitors generate time delays and result in different oscillation patterns. This understanding is significant for the study of chemical and biochemical rhythms and the design of similar behaviors.
In biological or abiotic systems, rhythms occur, owing to the coupling between positive and negative feedback loops in a reaction network. Using the Semenov-Whitesides oscillatory network for thioester hydrolysis as a prototype, we experimentally and theoretically analyzed the role of fast and slow inhibitors in oscillatory reaction networks. In the presence of positive feedback, a single fast inhibitor generates a time delay, resulting in two saddle-node bifurcations and bistability in a continuously stirred tank reactor. A slow inhibitor produces a node-focus bifurcation, resulting in damped oscillations. With both fast and slow inhibitors present, the node-focus bifurcation repeatedly modulates the saddle-node bifurcations, producing stable periodic oscillations. These fast and slow inhibitions result in a pair of time delays between steeply ascending and descending dynamics, which originate from the positive and negative feedbacks, respectively. This pattern can be identified in many chemical relaxation oscillators and oscillatory models, e.g., the bromate-sulfite pH oscillatory system, the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction, the trypsin oscillatory system, and the Boissonade-De Kepper model. This study provides a novel understanding of chemical and biochemical rhythms and suggests an approach to designing such behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available