4.5 Article

Kinetic study of the combined processes of a membrane bioreactor and a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor with advanced oxidation processes as a post-treatment stage for wastewater treatment

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.03.017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport in the training plan of Becas del Programa de Formacion de Profesorado Universitario (FPU) [AP2010-1552]
  2. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain
  3. Centre for the Development of Industrial Technology (CDTI) [CEN-20091028]
  4. University of Granada [CTM2009-11929-C02-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two membrane bioreactors with different mixed liquor suspended solid concentrations and a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor which contained carriers only in the aerobic zone of the bioreactor were used in parallel with the same municipal wastewater and compared. The hydraulic retention time was 18 h. Kinetic parameters for heterotrophic, autotrophic and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria were evaluated and related to organic matter and nitrogen removals. Three different advanced oxidation process technologies, i.e., H2O2/UV, Fe2+/H2O2/UV and TiO2/H2O2/UV systems, at two H2O2 concentrations of 1 g L-1 and 2 g L-1, were used to treat the effluents of each biological treatment in batch and were assessed regarding the kinetic performance. The hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor had the bestkinetic behavior for the heterotrophic and autotrophic biomass, with a value of TN removal of 72.39 +/- 7.57%. The maximum rate of total organic carbon degradation (eta(max,TOC)) was higher in the Tio(2)/H2O2/UV system for a constant H2O2 concentration, and was independent of the effluent. The Fe2+/H2O2/UV process was more suitable for the effluent from the hybrid MBBR-MBR since eta(max,TOC) was higher at the two H2O2 concentrations used, i.e., 83.07% and 81.54% at 1 g L-1 and 2 g L-1, respectively. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available