4.5 Review

A Multi-vocal Literature Review on challenges and critical success factors of phishing education, training and awareness

Journal

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.111899

Keywords

Phishing education; Phishing training; Phishing awareness; Human factors; Human-centric security; Usable security

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a comprehensive view of the challenges and critical success factors in the design, implementation, and evaluation stages of phishing education, training, and awareness (PETA). The findings highlight the need to address human-centric issues, bridge users' knowledge gaps, and adopt personalized approaches to enhance defense against phishing attacks.
Background: Phishing is a malicious attempt by cyber attackers to steal personal information through deception. Phishing attacks are often aided by carefully crafted phishing emails, which can go undetected by automated anti-phishing tools due to their limited accuracy. Studies found that user education, training, and awareness can thwart phishing attacks. Understanding diverse interconnected challenges and critical success factors of phishing education, training, and awareness (PETA) approaches can help improve organizations' defense against phishing.Objective: This study presents a comprehensive, structured view of the challenges and critical success factors of the design, implementation, and evaluation stages of PETA.Method: We have conducted a Multi-vocal Literature Review (MLR) by systematically collecting 53 academic studies and 16 grey studies from popular databases by following a well-known MLR guideline. Results: We identified 20 challenges and 23 critical success factors, some of which involve human-centric and socio-technical factors in PETA. Our findings point out the need for designing explainable anti-phishing systems and developing automated tools and platforms to conduct real-world phishing studies.Conclusion: Our systematic analysis of 69 studies has enabled us to highlight the need for addressing human-centric issues, incorporating users' knowledge gaps, and adopting personalized approaches in PETA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available