Journal
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad179
Keywords
cancer; epidemiology; screening
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study analyzed data from Bristol, North Somerset, and South Gloucestershire in England and found lower uptake of bowel cancer screening in more deprived areas, minority ethnic groups, and smokers.
Background: Survivalfromcolorectalcancerdependsonstageatdetection. InEngland, bowelcancermortalityhashistoricallybeenhighestindeprivedareas. DuringtheinitialstagesoftheCOVID-19pandemic, itwasnecessarytotemporarilyhaltmanyscreeningprogrammes, whichmayhaveledtoinequalitiesinuptakesincescreeningrestarted. Methods: Cross-sectionaldatafromtheBristol, NorthSomersetandSouthGloucestershireSystemwideDatasetwereanalyzed. Associationsofbaselinecharacteristicswithuptakeofbowelscreeningwereexaminedusinglogisticregression. Results: Amongst86850eligibleadultsaged60-74years, 5261hadnoscreeningrecord. Therewaslittleevidenceofassociationbetweennoscreeningandsex( adjustedoddsratio0.95(95% confidenceinterval0.90,1.02)). Absenceofscreeningrecordwasassociatedwithdeprivation( 1.26(1.14,1.40) forthemostcomparedwiththeleastdeprivedgroups), smoking(1.11(1.04,1.18)) comparedwithnosmokingrecordandblack( 1.36(1.09,1.70)) andmixed(1.08(1.01,1.15)) ethnicitycomparedwithwhiteethnicity. Conclusions: InadatasetcoveringawholeNHSIntegratedCareBoard, therewasevidenceofloweruptakeofbowelcancerscreeninginadultslivinginmoredeprivedareas, ofminorityethnicgroupsandwhosmoked.Thesefindingsmayhelpfocuscommunityengagementworkandinformresearchaimedatreducinginequalities.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available