4.5 Review

Clinical signs in functional cognitive disorders: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111447

Keywords

Cognition; Dementia; Diagnosis; Functional cognitive disorder; meta-analysis; Systematic review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Functional cognitive disorder (FCD) accounts for a significant portion of patients in memory clinics. Studies have found that FCD patients are typically younger, more educated, and have higher rates of anxiety, depression, and family history of dementia compared to neurodegenerative diseases. Promising language profiles and interaction abilities may aid in distinguishing FCD from neurodegeneration.
ObjectiveFunctional cognitive disorder (FCD) accounts for around a third of patients attending specialized memory clinics. It is also overrepresented in patients with other functional and somatic diagnoses. So far, no long-term diagnostic validity studies were conducted, and a positive diagnostic profile is yet to be identified. We aimed to review the literature on diagnostic signs and symptoms that allow for a discrimination between FCD and neurodegeneration.MethodsSystematic review of Ovid-Medline (R), Embase and PsycINFO databases. Relevant clinical features were extracted including demographics, symptom history, comorbidities, language and interaction profiles and cognitive assessments. Studies with quantifiable diagnostic accuracy data were included in a diagnostic meta-analysis.ResultsThirty studies (N = 8602) were included. FCD patients were younger, more educated, and more likely to have a family history of older onset dementia, abrupt symptom onset, and higher rates of anxiety, depression and sleep disturbance. Promising language profiles include longer duration of spoken answer, elaborated examples of memory failures, ability to answer compound and personal questions, and demonstration of working memory during interaction. The pooled analysis of clinical accuracy of different signs revealed that attending alone and bringing a handwritten list of problems particularly increase the odds of a FCD diagnosis. Current evidence from neuropsychometric studies in FCD is scarce.ConclusionsOur systematic review reinforces that positive signs contribute for an early differentiation between FCD and neurodegeneration in patients presenting with memory complaints. It is the first to attain quantitative value to clinical observations. These results will inform future diagnostic decision tools and intervention testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available