4.4 Review

A scoping review of studies examining mental health literacy among Arabs worldwide

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12952

Keywords

Arab; mental health literacy; scoping review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This scoping review examines the levels and correlates of mental health literacy (MHL) among Arabs. The findings indicate a moderate to high level of MHL among Arabs, with higher MHL associated with female gender, personal experience of mental health illness, and help-seeking behaviors. These findings highlight the need for further research and action in this field.
BackgroundThere is growing interest in Mental health literacy (MHL) worldwide, given its important role in overcoming barriers to service use and reducing mental health disparities. However, little is known about MHL among Arabs. AimWe conducted a scoping review to examine MHL levels and correlates among Arabs in both Arab and non-Arab countries, based on Jorm's MHL framework. MethodsWe conducted a scoping review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using six electronic databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Soc Index, Web of Science, and Scopus. Data were summarized and synthesized. ResultsNine studies examining MHL among Arabs met our inclusion criteria. Seven of them used a quantitative cross-sectional design. Four studies were conducted in Arab, and five were in non-Arab countries. Five studies were conducted among university students. The studies included indicate moderate to high levels of MHL. Higher MHL was associated with female gender, personal experience of mental health illness, and with help-seeking behaviours. ConclusionsOur review shows a significant lack of empirical studies on Arabs' MHL. These findings should be considered as a call for action for public health researchers, mental health workers, and policymakers to prioritize research in this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available