4.4 Article

Iodine Electric Propulsion System Thrust Validation: From Numerical Modeling to In-Space Testing

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/1.B39198

Keywords

Field Emission Electric Propulsion; Direct Thrust Measurement; Low Thrust Maneuvers; Electric Propulsion Space Experiment; Electric Propulsion Thrust Measurement; Spaceflight Mechanics; Inverse Problems; Low-Thrust Maneuvers; Low-Thrust Electrical Propulsion; Spacecraft Testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a comprehensive audit of an iodine-based gridded ion thruster is conducted. The thrust estimates from various methods are compared to demonstrate consistency and complete the thrust audit. The results show the agreement of thrust estimates from all four methods and highlight the importance of the study for future mission applications and low-thrust maneuver analysis.
In this paper, we complete a full-thrust audit of an iodine-based gridded ion thruster. Prior results have demonstrated excellent agreement between indirect and direct laboratory thrust estimates. Here, thrust estimates from numerical modeling, indirect laboratory testing from diagnostic probes and propulsion system telemetry, indirect in-space testing from onboard propulsion system telemetry, and direct in-space testing by analyzing orbital maneuvers are compared to demonstrate consistency between the four methods and complete the thrust audit. Results from recent in-space testing of the iodine-based thruster demonstrate that thrust estimates from all four methods agree to within three standard deviations of uncertainty for the 11 maneuvers studied. This thrust audit represents a critical step toward improving the understanding and technological maturity of iodine-based gridded ion thrusters for future mission applications, and it demonstrates the utility of recently developed in-space thrust inference techniques for analyzing low-thrust maneuvers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available