4.3 Article

The Ongoing Conundrum About DNP Project Variability

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 70-78

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.08.012

Keywords

DNP project; DNP curricula; Curriculum variability; Standardization

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces an important report from 2022, which examines the current state of DNP graduates in both practice and academia. The report's key findings, conclusions, and recommendations provide an updated understanding of DNP education and practice, as well as suggestions for improvement. The article focuses on the significance of the DNP Project in developing clinical leaders and scholars to improve healthcare outcomes.
An important publication titled The State of Doctor of Nursing Practice Education in 2022 reports on a national study that examined the current state of DNP graduates both in practice and in academia. The key findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the 2022 report provide an updated snapshot of current DNP education and practice along with recommendations for curricula and utilization of DNP graduates. This article focuses on the DNP Project as an integral component of the DNP curriculum in developing clinical leaders and scholars to improve healthcare outcomes and significantly impact healthcare transformation. Many publications have addressed the significant variability of the DNP Project among programs. This AACN report further underscores variability among DNP Projects regarding purpose, focus, format, development, evaluation, dissemination, and contribution to practice. The purpose of this article is to provide a perspective for nurse leaders and faculty about selected key findings, conclusions, and recommendations from this 2022 report that relate to DNP Projects as a means to improve the value and rigor of DNP Projects and decrease the variability among DNP programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available