4.8 Article

Fluorination strategy on pi-bridge of polymer donor for efficient photovoltaic performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 580, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233331

Keywords

Polymer solar cells; PM6; Fluorine substitution; 3-Fluorothiophene; 3-Fluoro-2-iodithiophene; Efficient photovoltaics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel fluorinated polymer donor, PM6-F, was designed and synthesized to simplify synthesis procedures and reduce reaction costs. Compared with the polymer analogue PM6, PM6-F exhibited better molecular packing, absorption, band gap, and energy level. PM6-F: IT-4F-based polymer solar cells achieved an excellent PCE of 14.90%, which is one of the highest recorded for IT-4F-based PSCs. This research demonstrates the promising strategy of modifying p-bridges with fluorine for developing high-efficiency polymer donors.
Although fluorine-contained polymers have been adopted in efficient polymer solar cells, complicated reaction methods and costly fluorination reagents have impeded large-scale application. Here, a novel fluorinated polymer donor, PM6-F, was designed and synthesized via a newly developed 3-fluoro-2-iodithiophene to simplify synthesis procedures and minimise reaction costs from modest raw materials. Compared with the polymer analogue PM6 without any fluorine substituent on the main chain, it was found that PM6-F with a better configuration exhibited more orderly molecular packing, stronger and broader absorption, a narrower optical band gap, and a lower-lying HOMO energy level. The PM6-F:IT-4F-based PSCs obtained an excellent PCE of 14.90% with a V-OC of 0.91 V, a J(SC) of 23.25 mA cm(-2), and an FF of 70.42%. Notably, the value of 14.90% was among the highest recorded in the literature for IT-4F-based PSCs. This research demonstrated that modifying p-bridges with fluorine is a promising strategy for developing high-efficiency polymer donors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available