4.8 Article

Fluorine doped non-perovskite-type Fe2TiO5 oxide without alkaline earth elements as cathode for efficient CO2 electrolysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 583, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233573

Keywords

Solid oxide electrolysis cells; Non-perovskite-type oxides; F doping; Electrochemical phase transition; CO2 electrolysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports a novel non-perovskite-type cathode material, Fe2TiO5-delta F0.2, with improved catalytic activity and stability for CO2 electrolysis, achieved through F-doping and the absence of alkaline earth elements.
Insufficient catalytic activity and stability of the present cathode materials inevitably hamper the industrial applications of solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs). Developing efficient cathodes is still a challenging task in the field of SOECs. This paper reports a novel non-perovskite-type cathode material with F doping (Fe2TiO5-delta F0.2) and without any alkaline earth elements. F doping increases the surface oxygen vacancies and improves the CO2 adsorption capacity and conductivity of Fe2TiO5. The absence of alkaline earth elements avoids the formation of insulating and inactive carbonates during CO2 electrolysis. It is worth noting that Fe2TiO5-delta F0.2 undergoes an ingenious phase transition during the electrolysis process, generating the heterogeneous Fe/FeTiO3-delta F0.2 inter-face as the active center. The resulting cathode (Fe/FeTiO3-delta F0.2) demonstrates good activity and stability for pure CO2 electrolysis. The current density is close to 2.0 A cm-2 at 1.6 V (850 degrees C) and the electrolysis voltage keeps near-constant during the 235 h galvanostatic test at 0.4 A cm-2 (800 degrees C). The newly formed heterogeneous Fe/FeTiO3-delta F0.2 microstructure is believed to be suitable for other catalytic processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available